Okay kids, in how many persons does God exist? Gordon Cheng

Robert Miller22/08/2008 05:02 AM

Yes, we love Colin at our place, too. He has been such a great help in raising kids in the faith - and he does, rightly, expect a good deal from them.

A couple of quirks when it comes to trinitarian theology among Colin’s works:

- the Jesus is the Way chant that says Jesus is the ‘only way to God’ rather than the only way to the Father

- the great little Titus 3:5 memory verse song that leaves out the Holy Spirit!

So maybe Colin still has some ground to make up before he ranks with DB Knox or Athanasius - still, I bet he writes better tunes than them.

Ian Carmichael23/08/2008 01:30 AM

Before we all get too carried away with the kids music and how good it is for our youngsters, let me quote from someone whom I respect greatly (if not for her expertise in children’s ministry, at least for her choice of marriage partner). Describing 5-7 year olds Stephanie Carmichael says:

Even though many of these children are reading and writing, their vocabulary is still limited. Try to use simple vocabulary, particularly when explaining difficult concepts ... They are still thinking on a concrete level, so you need to explain things on a concrete level. Limit abstract concepts, use visual aids. Remember to keep within their realm of experience.” (Their God is So BIG, page 30)

Put yourself in the shoes of the 5-7 year old (the average one, not the certainly-well-above-average Cheng girls) with limited vocab and concrete thinking: what would they understand by “In how many persons does God exist?” Even for adults that is a curious expression, with extremely abstract concepts most adults don’t really grasp. But what will it conjure up in the mind of a 5 year old?

“Oh, but they soak it up and one day they’ll understand it”. Maybe. But I understand the research shows that kids don’t tend to retain things they don’t understand. (I know, there’s always exceptions.) But why can’t we try to teach kids what they can understand now so that they relate to God now at their level, instead of trying to teach them as if they were adults?

I’m not saying don’t try to explain the Trinity to kids. All I’m suggesting is that we need to teach it in an age-appropriate way, conscious of their (God-given) limitations.

Every day we teach children, from the youngest age, about an abstract concept: the concept of God. Hopefully without using visual illustrations!

The concept of the Trinity is no different. I think we’re better off just saying it, then trying to reach for a visual analogy. (I’m sure I’ve heard some odd pictures of the Trinity involving oranges or sunlight which confused the issue for me, let alone a child.)

So I think there are some abstract concepts better just stated to a child, even if they can’t fully understand (as you point out, neither do we!). We might say they’re too young to understand the Trinity - but again, so are we.

I explain the Trinity as clearly as I can to my 4-year old (who is fascinated by ideas like God being everywhere, living forever, etc, like many 4-year olds) to help him make sense of the Bible.

After all, it’s only a short step from the Bible to questions like “Who is Jesus? Is he God? Is he God’s Son?”, questions it would be difficult to answer without explaining the Trinity.

I’m thankful that Colin backs me up at this point!

By the way, Ian, I should make it clear I think your wife’s book is wonderful, and have used it heaps teaching Sunday School.

I am curious to know, how would you or she explain the Trinity in an age-appropriate way to young children?

I can’t think of a simpler way than “3 persons in one God, not 3 gods”. I know it’s difficult to understand, but then the Trinity will always be beyond our understanding.

Have you got any other ideas of how to explain it?

Ian Carmichael23/08/2008 08:15 AM

The concept of the Trinity is no different. I think we’re better off just saying it, then trying to reach for a visual analogy.

Hi Jean

I think what I’m trying to say is more about the concreteness of the illustrations than their visual nature. It doesn’t have to be visual but it is helpful if it is concrete. (The Bible uses the concrete illustration of earthly “fathers” to help us understand God of course.)

And my concern is also with simplifying the vocab used. I suspect your starting point with your four year old is generally not “In how many persons does God exist?”

As I said, I’m all for teaching kids about the Trinity (as you say, how can we not?), so I don’t think we’re disagreeing.

One useful tip (again, learnt from Stephanie) is to not assume a child has understood, but to gently quiz them so you can be sure. Not having them just parrot what you’ve said back, but probing a bit to get them to express it in their own way.

PS We’re big Colin fans too, although our kids are teenagers now, and are stretching our understanding of abstract theological concepts these days!

Ian Carmichael23/08/2008 03:41 PM

I am curious to know, how would you or she explain the Trinity in an age-appropriate way to young children?

I think we would (and did with our kids and in the <a >Teaching Little Ones</a> curriculum) take the view that we will teach on the Trinity in the way that the Bible generally does. That is, it doesn’t really have a Westminster Confession type section outlining the nature of the Godhead, but rather, when we talked about Jesus we talked about him as God’s Son, and as God, and we explained that when he was on earth he was “able to do things that only God can do because he was God”. We would talk about God the Father in heaven and how he made us and loves us. We didn’t talk a lot about God the Holy Spirit, who is God living inside us and helping us, until primary age.

Did we try to explain the Trinity as three persons in one God? Not particularly. Nor did it ever occur to our infant kids that this was a problem that needed explaining. There’s a certain amount of abstract cognitive ability a child needs before they even understand the difficulty adults can sometimes have with the idea of three-in-one.

Thanks, Ian, I found that very helpful and enlightening, especially your distinction between visual and concrete (will have to think more about this), and your suggestions about how to teach children about the Trinity. I think it did come up with our 4-year old. But maybe it was me who brought it up, to try and answer one of those impossible questions:
“Is Jesus God?” “Is Jesus God’s Son?” “Does God live in me” etc. etc.!!

Commenting rules

If you would like your comment to be considered for publication, please observe the following rules:

  1. Please use your FULL NAME (your real name, not an alias).
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Be godly.

Failure to adhere to these rules will result in your comment being quietly deleted.

If you want to give us feedback but don't want your comments to appear on the blog, DON'T use the form below. Instead, please send us an email or click on the button below.

Your Comment

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Beyond Greed

Sponsors

Placeholder

Recent comments

RSS logo

Stephen Jackson on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!

Sam Freney on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!

Marty Foord on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!

Dianne Howard on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!

Mike Bull on Daniel 2-7, Harry Potter and Narnia

Current discussions

RSS logo

Recent posts

RSS logo RSS logo

The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel! by Tony Payne (4 comments). Regular Sola Panel readers will no doubt have detected a little slowness and quietness over the past six weeks or so. … more

Kids’ culture watch spot: Facing fear by Gordon Cheng (3 comments). By popular demand (two people asked), here is my next script for a culture watch spot I did with the kids … more

Daniel 2-7, Harry Potter and Narnia by Gordon Cheng (1 comment). It's a Sunday as I write this, and I'm speaking on Daniel 2 and 7 later this morning at a friend's … more

A constituent on same-sex marriage by Sandy Grant (34 comments). Last year, the Australian Parliament agreed that its Members of Parliament (MPs) should seek the … more

A tribute to John Stott by Sandy Grant (2 comments). Friends, I'm not ashamed to say I shed a tear when I opened up my computer on Thursday morning to read … more

Talkin’ ’bout my generation (part 3): On giants’ shoulders by Scott Newling (26 comments). This is the third post in this series; you can read part one, and more

Bible reading with kids by Sandy Grant (0 comments). I was asked for recommendations for resources that would encourage parents to read the Bible with their kids, especially … more

Talkin’ ’bout my generation (part 2): Stepping aside (not out) so others can step up (not in) by Scott Newling (3 comments). This is the second post in this series; you can read the first post, Unassuming … more

One more sip of the coffee by Tony Payne (8 comments). Sandy Grant is a man of integrity. Back in the early days of Sola Panel, I wrote a post … more

Talkin’ ’bout my generation (part 1): Unassuming generations by Scott Newling (30 comments). There is a model of ‘intergenerational theological decline’ that has been doing the rounds of late, and perhaps you … more

Tony Payne

Tony Payne

Paul is one of the Staff Editors at Matthias Media. He is married to Cathy and has three fantastic kids. He loves student ministry, reading, writing music and playing the saxophone, and is looking forward to meeting Jesus face to face.

Sola Panellists



Some other sites
we like  (Why these?)

Ministry partners