Stephen Jackson on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!
Sam Freney on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!
Marty Foord on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!
Dianne Howard on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!
Mike Bull on Daniel 2-7, Harry Potter and Narnia
The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel! by Tony Payne (4 comments). Regular Sola Panel readers will no doubt have detected a little slowness and quietness over the past six weeks or so. … more
Kids’ culture watch spot: Facing fear by Gordon Cheng (3 comments). By popular demand (two people asked), here is my next script for a culture watch spot I did with the kids … more
Daniel 2-7, Harry Potter and Narnia by Gordon Cheng (1 comment). It's a Sunday as I write this, and I'm speaking on Daniel 2 and 7 later this morning at a friend's … more
A constituent on same-sex marriage by Sandy Grant (34 comments). Last year, the Australian Parliament agreed that its Members of Parliament (MPs) should seek the … more
A tribute to John Stott by Sandy Grant (2 comments). Friends, I'm not ashamed to say I shed a tear when I opened up my computer on Thursday morning to read … more
Talkin’ ’bout my generation (part 3): On giants’ shoulders by Scott Newling (26 comments). This is the third post in this series; you can read part one, and more
Bible reading with kids by Sandy Grant (0 comments). I was asked for recommendations for resources that would encourage parents to read the Bible with their kids, especially … more
Talkin’ ’bout my generation (part 2): Stepping aside (not out) so others can step up (not in) by Scott Newling (3 comments). This is the second post in this series; you can read the first post, Unassuming … more
One more sip of the coffee by Tony Payne (8 comments). Sandy Grant is a man of integrity. Back in the early days of Sola Panel, I wrote a post … more
Talkin’ ’bout my generation (part 1): Unassuming generations by Scott Newling (30 comments). There is a model of ‘intergenerational theological decline’ that has been doing the rounds of late, and perhaps you … more
Paul is one of the Staff Editors at Matthias Media. He is married to Cathy and has three fantastic kids. He loves student ministry, reading, writing music and playing the saxophone, and is looking forward to meeting Jesus face to face.
good post.
I happened to see this via Tim Challies. A few comments (with the disclaimer that I haven’t read the book you are commenting about) -
I agree that preaching the gospel without preaching the law ends up producing a meaningless message - evangelicals have been doing this for a while, and with disastrous results. I think this is how you are understanding and using Stott.
However I find your interpretation of Stott interesting light of a couple of facts.
Stott has denied your “place where the fire burns without being extinguished” (see http://www.the-highway.com/annihilationism_Packer.html )
Stott’s book on preaching, “Between Two Worlds: The Challenge of Preaching Today” has been used as a defense by evangelical speakers for ‘practical’ sermons in place of preaching law and gospel.
Thoughts?
A new and more powerful proclamation of law is perhaps the most pressing need of the hour; men would have little difficulty with the gospel if they had only learned the lesson of the law.—J. Gresham Machen
Our sinfulness is important, but surely more so is seeing why this God is worth knowing -why do I want the access that the cross makes possible, why the relationship, why the adoption etc. If we don’t portray the glories of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit then why would anyone want to know… and you can do that from the law, you can do that as you preach the cross, you can do that from any of Scripture.
Bernie, I am sorry that Stott has gone down the annihilationist route and I think it’s a grave mistake. I believe it is a position he has come to late in life; I don’t at any rate see evidence of this mistake in his Cross of Christ.
As for the preaching of practical sermons as a <i>substitute</i> for preaching law and gospel, that is a mistake that I believe Stott neither falls into nor endorses.
Bill, great stuff. Gresham Machen da man.
Dave Bish I don’t for a moment deny that portraying the glory of God is more important than depicting our sinfulness. But we have to start somewhere, and it seems to me that Stott’s point is about starting where we are—mired in sin, needing divine assistance and radically unaware that we are in any trouble whatsoever.
Of course, a right portrayal of the glory of God may reveal exactly our predicament; Isaiah 6:1-5 springs to mind as a perfect exmple.
Commenting rules
If you would like your comment to be considered for publication, please observe the following rules:
Failure to adhere to these rules will result in your comment being quietly deleted.
If you want to give us feedback but don't want your comments to appear on the blog, DON'T use the form below. Instead, please send us an email or click on the button below.
Your Comment
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.