Wreck-conciliation or reconciliation? Ben Pfahlert

Ben Pfahlert

Reconciliation is a hot topic. It always has been and it always will be. In the first century AD, Paul wrote about reconciling Jews and Gentiles (Eph 2:11-22). In the 20th-century, the nation of South Africa created the ‘Truth and Reconciliation Commission’ to deal with the atrocities of apartheid. The Australian Government is only now ‘reconciling’ with the indigenous population.

Reconciliation has been and always will be a burning issue so long as someone (or some people) sins against another (or others). Whenever there is a sin, a sinner and a slighted one (i.e. the one who is sinned against), reconciliation will be necessary.

But what I find very interesting is that people are often better at commentating reconciliation than they are at doing it. It's a bit like sport: Barry sits at home on the couch, shaking his head at Grant Hackett's ‘lacklustre performance’ in the 1500m freestyle, blissfully unaware of the fact that he himself couldn't swim 50 metres if his life depended on it.

Human beings talk ad nauseum about reconciliation, but do we actually do it? What happens in people's homes? Do we work hard at repairing relationships when we damage them? Do people reconcile well in the workplace?

Do we practice wreck-conciliation or reconciliation?

Australian wreck-conciliation

Sadly, Australians practise wreck-conciliation. Why do I say that? Well, firstly, we find it hard to admit sin sincerely, let alone articulate an apology. We're experts in ‘hollow sorrow’. Tell me if some of these statements sound familiar: “I'm sorry that you feel upset by what I said John; I didn't mean to belittle you”; “I'm sorry Jenny if I've caused offense”. Our apologies are lame. We don't take responsibility for our actions. If you examine the two apologies above, you'll realize that they're not apologies, they're veiled accusations. The apologists are implying that John and Jenny are petty to have even felt slighted. My wife Emma and I have a little joke in our marriage to add humour into our apologies. I sometimes say, “Emma I was rrrrrrr ... I was rrrrrrr ... I was wwrrrrrrrong!”

The second contributing factor to Aussie wreck-conciliation is the failure to ask for forgiveness. Even if we are having a bumper day of humility and we say, “Bill, I'm sorry we didn't pay your invoice on time”, we haven't reconciled. All we have done is communicated our sin. We've told the ‘slighted’ person that we feel sorry about the transgression. It is an emotional declaration but it isn't necessarily repentance. Godly sorrow requires repentance (2 Cor 7:10).

The third contributor to wreck-conciliation in Australian relationships is the failure to forgive. Imagine a person—say, a child—who actually does take responsibility for their sin and approaches their Dad to apologize. What common response do they get? “Son, don't say sorry. Don't do it again.” They walk away without forgiveness, but worse than that, they are unreconciled and burdened. Now they've got to be perfect to get Dad's acceptance.

Christian reconciliation

So what's the way forward? How do we practise garden-variety reconciliation? Reconciliation requires three As:

  • The transgressor must make an admission of sin—out loud, with words, to the person who's been slighted.
  • The transgressor then needs to ask for forgiveness (from God as well: 2 Sam 12:13).
  • The one slighted then needs to offer absolution: they need to forgive the transgressor.

Let me give you an example. I was at a barbecue the other day, talking to one of my friends. My 4-year-old son Edmund came up to ask me a question. He said, “Excuse me, Daddy”, and I failed to respond. He said it a second time, a third time and then finally started crying in exasperation. I looked down because the noise was unavoidable, and asked with a frustrated voice, “What's wrong, Edmund?”—words to which he cried even louder. Emma then said, “Ben, he's been trying to get your attention for quite a while”. I realized my sin and my need to reconcile with Edmund. I then got down on my haunches and said, “Edmund, were you trying to get Daddy's attention?” He nodded through the tears. I then said to him, “Edmund, I am sorry that I did not listen to you when you were speaking to me. I was selfish. I'm sorry I did that. Will you please forgive me?” Edmund replied, “Yes, Daddy”.

Reconciliation needs the three As. This is the way the gospel works out in relationship. We need to admit our sin before God the Father (Rom 3:10-12), we need to ask him to forgive us through the blood of Jesus Christ (1 Pet 3:18), and words of assurance like John 3:36 tell us that we're forgiven, absolved by God and reconciled to him.

2 Comments »

Stephen Jackson14/05/2008 02:21 AM

Ben,

Good to see a blog that addresses the burning social issue of our times, namely our relationship with australia’s indigenous peoples.

I agree with the perspective that it is the dominant culture (transgressor in your language) that is required to overcome the narrowness of their position to admit to the reality of history, and their hand in it.

Equally so, it is incumbent on the transgressed to show grace and accept an apology.  In my experience and frequent dealings with aboriginal people at the grass roots level, they are more than prepared to do this.  In a sense, they are “new wine ready for new wineskins”, ready to engage in constructive, collaborative relationship building. 

Sadly, this dynamic is not always reflected in the leadership of both sides. 

However, hope springs eternal, and the recent Federal Govt apology to the stolen generation is a great start in ‘naming some realities’, rather than ‘blaming the realities’.

Jesus is reported to have said that he came not for the strong, but for the weak.  In our times, we need to recognise that we are the strong dominant culture, and indigenous australians have a significantly weaker position in our society.  Our challenge is to hear the call of Jesus to respond to this gross power differential.

Keep the social focus coming!  It is the work of the Spirit!

Hi Ben,

Wreck-conciliation certainly is not unique to Aussie land.

I have also noticed here in South Africa that apologies are usually pushed back on the victim as you described. “I’m sorry you got hurt” and others.

People are actually sorry that got caught out, and are not really sorry for having done wrong. When people can admit to their sin, like you said, it would be a great step forward.

However, in our culture today, it seems that everybody is a victim and no-one wants to take responsibility for their actions.

Great post!

Commenting rules

If you would like your comment to be considered for publication, please observe the following rules:

  1. Please use your FULL NAME (your real name, not an alias).
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Be godly.

Failure to adhere to these rules will result in your comment being quietly deleted.

If you want to give us feedback but don't want your comments to appear on the blog, DON'T use the form below. Instead, please send us an email or click on the button below.

Your Comment

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Know and Tell the Gospel

Sponsors

Placeholder

Recent comments

RSS logo

Stephen Jackson on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!

Sam Freney on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!

Marty Foord on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!

Dianne Howard on The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel!

Mike Bull on Daniel 2-7, Harry Potter and Narnia

Current discussions

RSS logo

Recent posts

RSS logo RSS logo

The Sola Panel is dead; long live the Sola Panel! by Tony Payne (4 comments). Regular Sola Panel readers will no doubt have detected a little slowness and quietness over the past six weeks or so. … more

Kids’ culture watch spot: Facing fear by Gordon Cheng (3 comments). By popular demand (two people asked), here is my next script for a culture watch spot I did with the kids … more

Daniel 2-7, Harry Potter and Narnia by Gordon Cheng (1 comment). It's a Sunday as I write this, and I'm speaking on Daniel 2 and 7 later this morning at a friend's … more

A constituent on same-sex marriage by Sandy Grant (34 comments). Last year, the Australian Parliament agreed that its Members of Parliament (MPs) should seek the … more

A tribute to John Stott by Sandy Grant (2 comments). Friends, I'm not ashamed to say I shed a tear when I opened up my computer on Thursday morning to read … more

Talkin’ ’bout my generation (part 3): On giants’ shoulders by Scott Newling (26 comments). This is the third post in this series; you can read part one, and more

Bible reading with kids by Sandy Grant (0 comments). I was asked for recommendations for resources that would encourage parents to read the Bible with their kids, especially … more

Talkin’ ’bout my generation (part 2): Stepping aside (not out) so others can step up (not in) by Scott Newling (3 comments). This is the second post in this series; you can read the first post, Unassuming … more

One more sip of the coffee by Tony Payne (8 comments). Sandy Grant is a man of integrity. Back in the early days of Sola Panel, I wrote a post … more

Talkin’ ’bout my generation (part 1): Unassuming generations by Scott Newling (30 comments). There is a model of ‘intergenerational theological decline’ that has been doing the rounds of late, and perhaps you … more

Tony Payne

Tony Payne

Paul is one of the Staff Editors at Matthias Media. He is married to Cathy and has three fantastic kids. He loves student ministry, reading, writing music and playing the saxophone, and is looking forward to meeting Jesus face to face.

Sola Panellists



Some other sites
we like  (Why these?)

Ministry partners